OUR Independent guide to voting for the environment this election
Do political parties have a plan for the things you care about?
How much do you care about these three issues?
Turn the dials!
I don't care
I care a lot
Support clean energy
I don't care
I care a lot
Cut pollution
I don't care
I care a lot
Protect our reefs, rivers, forests and wildlife
How much you care:
How the parties compare:
Together, our votes are powerful. Will you sign the pledge?
I’ll vote for a candidate who will:
Join 31001 voters
Donate now so more people can see this scorecard!
Everyone should know how the major parties compare.
Your gift today will mean we can publish their scores in newspapers, billboards, Facebook and Google ads for all voters to see. And we can hand out scorecards at polling booths on election day rating political candidates on their environmental commitment, so people know what they are really voting for.
Donate now to help spread the word.
Donate nowWho is ACF?
The Australian Conservation Foundation is Australia’s national environment organisation.
We are a quarter of a million people strong. We are proudly independent, non-partisan and funded by donations from Australians.
coalition
Test 1. Policies to ensure clean renewables power 100% of Australia’s electricity by 2035, and 100% of all Australia’s energy before 2050?
Score
1 / 5
Comment
The Coalition supports the current RET, which will deliver 33,000 gigawatt hours of renewable energy by 2020 (equates to about 23 per cent of current electricity production). To be reviewed (per legislation) in 2020. Announced $1bn Clean Energy Innovation Fund to encourage new technology to assist in the transition to clean energy". This funding was transferred from CEFC.
Announced development of Low Emissions Technology Roadmap to be led by the CSIRO. Through this work, CSIRO will highlight areas of potential growth in Australia’s clean technology sector, map the development of new emissions reduction technologies, and identify opportunities to be part of future global energy supply chains. Source 1, Source 2
Test 2. Double the energy productivity of Australia’s economy by 2030?
Score
2 / 3
Comment
Released National Energy Productivity Plan with target to improve Australia’s energy productivity by 40 per cent between now and 2030. Source
Test 3. Retain the Clean Energy Finance Corporation and Australian Renewable Energy Agency with existing or additional resources?
Score
1.5 / 3
Comment
Established $1 billion Clean Energy Innovation Fund jointly managed by CEFC and ARENA after attempt to abolish both was blocked by the Senate. This announcement maintained both bodies, but took $1B funding away from CEFC, removed ARENA's important grant making function, and reconfirmed the intention to remove the remaining ARENA budget of approx $1.3B. Source 1, Source 2, Source 3
Test 4. Introduce vehicle fuel pollution standards by 2017 to bring Australia into line with EU standards?
Score
0.5 / 1
Comment
Established Ministerial Forum to examine vehicle emissions standards in Australia and vehicle testing arrangements. Working group will report by 31 March 2017 to the Ministerial Forum on a draft implementation plan for new measures. No specific commitments have been made. Source 1
Test 5. Stop public subsidies to polluting fossil fuel industries?
Score
0 / 3
Comment
Budget showed no reform of the Fuel Tax Credit subsidy, which will cost Australians almost $26.5 billion over the next four years. No change to aviation fuel excise concessions which subsidise the fuel of the aviation sector; will cost Australian taxpayers $5.4 billion over the next four years.
Test 6. Phase out uranium mining?
Score
-1 / 1
Comment
Coalition supports expansion of uranium mining.
Test 7. Advance a new approach for the responsible and transparent management of Australia’s radioactive waste?
Score
1 / 3
Comment
Coalition is commited to consent basis for a new domestic waste dump but has also given public support to the international waste dump proposal.
Test 8. Stop new uranium sales and nuclear cooperation agreements?
Score
-1 / 1
Comment
Advancing sales deals to India, UAE and Ukraine
Test 9. Set pollution targets to progressively reduce our pollution and enable Australia to reach net zero climate pollution by 2050 at the latest?
Score
2 / 5
Comment
Coalition has committed to 5-25% reduction on 2000 levels by 2020 based on the ambition of global agreement. Despite conditions being met to increase to higher target in this range, has maintained target of 5% by 2020. On track to meet and beat this target with benefit of Kyoto carryover. Announced target before Paris COP of 26-28% reduction on 2005 levels by 2030 (19.5% on 2000 levels). Analysis has shown that if others do the same share of action it would be consistent with 3-4°C of global warming. The target leaves us at the back of the pack among other developed countries. As part of Paris COP agreement, the Government agreed to reach net zero in the second half of this century. Source 1, Source 2, Source 3
Test 10. Be effective, durable, scalable and able to achieve the goal of reducing Australia’s climate pollution to net zero by 2050 at the latest?
Score
2 / 5
Comment
The centrepiece of the Coalition climate policy is the Direct Action Plan and $2.55B Emissions Reduction Fund (ERF) that directly funds carbon reduction from business and industry through reverse auctions. To date, 67% of this fund has been spent on three auctions, but only 7% of the emissions reductions needed for the 2030 target have been purchased. No additional funding was provided in 2016-17 budget. In addition, the safeguard mechanism which ensures that emissions reductions purchased by the government are not offset by significant increases in emssions above business-as-usual levels elsewhere in the economy does not capture the biggest polluters and is not a mechanism to drive down climate pollution. In summary these central policies are expensive, ineffective means of meeting our 2030 pollution reduction target and are not driving changes in the energy sector which is the greatest contributor to climate pollution in Australia. The Coalition is also "implementing a National Energy Productivity Plan, reducing emissions from ozone-depleting gases and supporting investments in new technology such as solar storage. Source 1, Source 2, Source 3, Source 3
Test 11. Keep and adequately fund the independent Climate Change Authority, or similar independent authority that advises the government on climate change?
Score
0 / 1
Comment
Climate Change Authority only has funding guaranteed until the end of 2016. No new funding in the budget. Source
Test 12. Commit our fair share of funding – $550 million in 2016-17, growing to $1.6 billion by 2020 – to the Green Climate Fund?
Score
1 / 3
Comment
In 2014, announced $200m over 4 years for Green Climate Fund out of current aid budget. Source
Test 13. Provide a plan to phase out Australia’s coal-fired power stations, starting with the dirtiest, most inefficient and polluting power stations?
Score
0 / 5
Comment
No policy found. Government has stated: "The government is committed to its Emissions Reduction Fund, which encourages companies to cut pollution through taxpayer-funded grants, and its renewable energy target.
Test 14. Ensure no new coal mines or coal mine extensions are approved.
Score
-3 / 5
Comment
Government still approving new mines (e.g., Carmichael). No policy found that indicates approvals will end and is investing in the growth of the fossil fuel sector including through $248 million in Australian Government funding over the four years from 2015/16 to 2018/19 for Industry Growth Sectors initiative that includes oil, gas and energy resources (including coal and uranium). Source
Test 15. Allocate funding for social and economic transition plans to retrain people who work in regions affected by the closure of coal operations, providing new opportunities for these communities?
Score
0 / 3
Comment
No policy found.
Test 16. Introduce a federal plan to bolster mine rehabilitation securities from liable companies?
Score
0 / 1
Comment
No policy or commitment found
Test 17. Leverage investment and increase the amount of carbon securely stored in biodiverse natural landscapes in line with the goal of net zero carbon pollution by 2050?
Score
1 / 5
Comment
The Governments Emissions Reduction Fund has invested in biodiverse carbon stores but has serious limitations in its application, funding, additionality and prioritisation of investments. Source
Test 18. Maintain funding for the National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility?
Score
0 / 1
Comment
The Australian Government has committed $9 million over three years (2014-17) to NCCARF, but there is no further funding beyond 2017. Source, Source 2
Test 19. Introduce a national strategy and standards for sustainable and resilient cities and urban centres?
Score
1 / 3
Comment
National platform calls for development of integrated long term strategies.
The Smart Cities Plan includes: The establishment of an infrastructure financing unit to work closely with the private sector on innovative financing solutions; andcommitting $50 million to accelerate planning and development works on major infrastructure projects to develop business cases and investment options. Source 1, Source 2, Source 3
Test 20. Provide funding support for state and local government implementation of adaptation strategies?
Score
0 / 1
Comment
No funding commitment.
Test 21. Provide an effective national system of nature protection laws to protect and improve the health of Australia’s air, land, water and biodiversity by December 2018?
Score
0 / 5
Comment
Commitment in the National Platform to improve environmental law.
One Stop Shop policy currently proposed to devolve federal aproval powers and does not maintain federal standards or lead to any improvements in environmental health. Source 1, Source 2
Test 22. Expand Australian government oversight of climate issues, water resources, native vegetation and reserves within 12 months of taking office?
Score
0 / 3
Comment
No formal policy or commitment. One Stop Shop policy will reduce, rather than expand, federal government oversight of these issues.
Test 23. Ensure the federal government has direct responsibility to regulate projects that impact on matters of national importance?
Score
-3 / 3
Comment
One Stop Shop policy currently proposes to devolve federal aproval powers. Source
Test 24. Establish and adequately resource an independent statutory authority to administer our national environmental law by December 2018?
Score
0 / 3
Comment
No formal policy or commitment
Test 25. Ensure greater public access and accountability under national environmental law, including open standing provisions and merits review of decisions within 12 months of taking office?
Score
-1 / 1
Comment
Current policy is to repeal extended standing provisions under the EPBC Act. Source
Test 26. Commit $1 billion annually by 2018 in a National Environment Fund?
Score
2 / 5
Comment
Current spending in 2016/17 Budget: Administered Funds for Outcome 1.1 Total - $373,066m (made up of $230m in NHT, $9.9m environment stewardship, $89m Green Army, $39m Reef Trust Special account.Overall reduction in National Heritage Trust Funding to $188 million to 2018 (reduction $42m) and total administerd reduction of $33m to $340m. New money for Reef 2050 in 2016 budget allocated out of landcare program, new money for Reef Trust does not occur until 2019 (40.0 million in 2019-20, $15.0 million in 2020-21 and $15.0 million in 2021-22). Additional money for 20 million trees ($70) already money within NHT allocation.
Announced $30m for local parks and environment - $24 million for public open space, $5 million for community solar projects and $1 million for outboard motors for lifesavers.
Announced $7.5m for Yellow Crazy Ants in World Heritage Area
Test 27. Rule out logging, mining and other unsustainable land and sea uses in Australia’s World Heritage Areas?
Score
0 / 1
Comment
No formal policy or commitment
Test 28. Introduce national policies and regulations to protect and restore ecosystems along the Great Dividing Range, including establishing the Great Forest National Park?
Score
1 / 3
Comment
Current 20 Million Trees and National Landcare program partly achieve this, but investment is not sufficient and program design is questionable for the Green Army. No commitment to establish Great Forest National Park Source
Test 29. Create new tax incentives for the management and restoration of ecosystems on private land?
Score
0 / 1
Comment
No formal policy or commitment
Test 30. Increase funding for Indigenous Protected Areas, scaling up to $30 million per annum by 2020 as part of a National Environment Fund?
Score
0 / 1
Comment
No budget commitment to maintain or increase funding for Indigenous Protected Areas beyond 2017.
Test 31. Commit to supporting the employment of 5,000 Indigenous rangers by 2025?
Score
0 / 1
Comment
No budget commitment to maintain or increase funding for Indigenous Rangers beyond 2017.
Test 32. Provide commitments to the expansion of sustainable tourism and renewable energy initiatives across northern Australia to benefit local communities?
Score
0 / 3
Comment
No explicit commitments or consideration of appropriate criteria yet for the Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility to enable this.
Test 33. Deliver the commitments made under the Murray Darling Basin Plan on time and in full, including the delivery of outcomes equivalent to 3,200 gigalitres in environmental water?
Score
3 / 3
Comment
The Coallition has publicly committed to implementing the Murray Darling Basin Plan “on time and in full” Source
Test 34. Provide a plan to reward private landholders for managing floodplains to produce environmental benefits for the river system?
Score
0 / 1
Comment
No formal policy or commitment
Test 35. Adequately resource the Commonwealth Environmental Water Holder to build and deliver its critically important portfolio of environment water?
Score
0 / 3
Comment
In the the 2016 Budget funding for the CEWH is forecast to effectively run out in 2017-18. Source
Test 36. Support and fund a science-driven program to eradicate invasive European carp in the Murray-Darling Basin?
Score
1 / 1
Comment
Commitment to funding and implementing a science led program to tackle invasive Carp. Source
Test 37. Revitalise national water reform in Australia and set out a road-map for the recognition of Indigenous water rights?
Score
0 / 1
Comment
Abolished the National Water Comission. Proposed to construct more dams with $2 billion loan facility. Amendments to Water act do not inlcude provisions for Indigenous Water Rights. Source, Source 2
Test 38. Introduce a well-resourced and complete system of annual national and regional environmental accounts by 2019?
Score
0 / 1
Comment
No formal policy or commitment
Test 39. Expand the mandate of the Productivity Commission to explicitly include environmental issues?
Score
0 / 1
Comment
No formal policy or commitment
Test 40. Introduce transparent and independent analysis of the social, economic and environmental costs and benefits of all major projects by 2017?
Score
0 / 1
Comment
No formal policy or commitment
back to the scoreboardLabor
Test 1. Policies to ensure clean renewables power 100% of Australia’s electricity by 2035, and 100% of all Australia’s energy before 2050?
Score
3 / 5
Comment
Labor would be ambitious in growing the renewable energy sector beyond 2020 by adopting policies to deliver at least 50% of our electricity generation from renewable sources by 2030. A Labor Government would engage with industry, experts, investors, scientists, researchers and consumers to put in place the most appropriate policy settings for the period 2020-2030. Labor in Government would announce the proposed design details by 1 October 2017 with legislation governing post-2020 arrangements to be introduced to Parliament in late 2017. Committed $206 million for concentrated solar funding round through ARENA. Source 1, Source 2
Test 2. Double the energy productivity of Australia’s economy by 2030?
Score
3 / 3
Comment
Labor is committed to double energy productivity by 2030. Source 1, Source 2
Test 3. Retain the Clean Energy Finance Corporation and Australian Renewable Energy Agency with existing or additional resources?
Score
2 / 3
Comment
CEFC was legislated by ALP in 2012 with funding of $10 billion over 5 years with funding starting from July 1, 2013. ALP Climate Change Action Plan has committed to restore flexibility to CEFC by broadening investment mandate to make tech neutral and setting appropriate targets for investment. Will lock in investment mandate for full term of next Parliament. Committed to work with new ARENA Board and to provide $206.6m for concentrated solar funding round. No commitment to restore grant function or full $1.3 of remaining original funding. But, after budget reply: "ARENA is fully funded for 2016/17 but we recognise that the balance of funds and programs needs further consideration to ensure that we have what is actually required to achieve our targets for the renewable revolution and deliver on the commitments in our Climate Change Action Plan. On winning Government we will sit down with the ARENA board and work through exactly what is required". Source 1, Source 2, Source 3, Source 4
Test 4. Introduce vehicle fuel pollution standards by 2017 to bring Australia into line with EU standards?
Score
0.5 / 1
Comment
Labor is committed to the introduction of mandatory light vehicle standards to align with US standards--to reduce the emissions intensity for all light vehicles from the current 192g CO2/km to 105g CO2/km in 2025 through the implementation of mandatory standards. These standards will be phased-in from 2018.
Test 5. Stop public subsidies to polluting fossil fuel industries?
Score
0 / 3
Comment
No policy found.
Test 6. Phase out uranium mining?
Score
-1 / 1
Comment
Current policy allows expansion of uranium mining. Source
Test 7. Advance a new approach for the responsible and transparent management of Australia’s radioactive waste?
Score
2 / 3
Comment
The ALP supports the same consent based process as Coalition for domestic waste site but federal ALP policy is opposed to international waste dump. Source
Test 8. Stop new uranium sales and nuclear cooperation agreements?
Score
0 / 1
Score
-1 / 1
Comment
ALP has supported the sales deal with India and not strongly contested other sales deals. Source
Test 9. Set pollution targets to progressively reduce our pollution and enable Australia to reach net zero climate pollution by 2050 at the latest?
Score
2 / 5
Comment
"Initially committed to 5-25% reduction on 2000 levels by 2020 and set 5% target from this range while in Government. Has maintained 5% target despite conditions having been met for increase (reference in Climate Change Action Plan). Endorsed Paris Agreement, and to ensure Australia does its fair share, committed to a net zero pollution target by 2050; a target of 45 per cent carbon pollution reduction on 2005 levels by 2030 consistent with advice from the Climate Change Authority; to set a 2025 target within a year of coming to Government; and to five-yearly reviews to keep policy goals updated and consistent with the latest science and actions of other nations."
Test 10. Be effective, durable, scalable and able to achieve the goal of reducing Australia’s climate pollution to net zero by 2050 at the latest?
Score
4 / 5
Comment
Announced a 50% renewable electricity generation goal by 2030, a two-phased internationally linked Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) including a 2018-20 cap on pollution for liable entities; a commitment to double energy productivity by 2030; an electricity modernisation review; and a strategic industries taskforce. Source 1, Source 2 Source 3
Test 11. Keep and adequately fund the independent Climate Change Authority, or similar independent authority that advises the government on climate change?
Score
1 / 1
Comment
Labor established the CCA to provide independent advice on Australia’s emissions reduction targets and to regularly review these targets. Committed to retain CCA including $17.4m over forward estimates to reverse Gov's abolition and appropriately resource.
Test 12. Commit our fair share of funding – $550 million in 2016-17, growing to $1.6 billion by 2020 – to the Green Climate Fund?
Score
1 / 3
Comment
"Labor is committed to ensuring Australia's continued commitment to international climate finance, in line with the shared international goal of mobilising public and private funds to assist vulnerable communities address climate change. Labor will ensure Australia works cooperatively with our major trading partners and the rest of the international community on cliamte change action, adaptation and finance. Labor will not reduce the current allocations for the Green Climate Fund."
Test 13. Provide a plan to phase out Australia’s coal-fired power stations, starting with the dirtiest, most inefficient and polluting power stations?
Score
3.5 / 5
Comment
Labor has committed to develop a long-term plan to ensure the orderly transition of Australia’s energy generation from polluting coal-fired power stations to renewable and clean energy, with a core focus on supporting workers and communities. Electricity Modernisation Strategy will include a managed, predictable long-term process of modernisation for the electricity sector. In addition, ALP plans to maximise the job opportunities from clean energy and clean technology, while also securing the future of critical Australian industries through a Strategic Industries Task Force. This will be supported by a Strategic Industries Reserve Fund of $300m to support the transition of key industries to 2020. Labor will establish a Just Transition Unit in the Department of Environment to co-ordinate the work of different Commonwealth agencies to the implementation of that element of the Paris Agreement. Source Labor National Platform, page 189
Test 14. Ensure no new coal mines or coal mine extensions are approved.
Score
0 / 5
Comment
The ALP Platform states that "Australia is both an important producer of established sources of energy, including coal, gas, oil and condensate, and a world-class developer of renewable and sustainable energy technologies." Has committed to provide no public funding for Carmichael, uncertain whether would approve the mine if in Government. Source
Test 15. Allocate funding for social and economic transition plans to retrain people who work in regions affected by the closure of coal operations, providing new opportunities for these communities?
Score
3 / 3
Comment
ALP climate approach includes Electricity Modernisation Plan to assist the transition of companies, workers and communities in the power sector move to less emissions intensive industries.
Test 16. Introduce a federal plan to bolster mine rehabilitation securities from liable companies?
Score
0 / 1
Comment
No policy found.
Test 17. Leverage investment and increase the amount of carbon securely stored in biodiverse natural landscapes in line with the goal of net zero carbon pollution by 2050?
Score
4 / 5
Comment
ALP's Climate Change Action Plan has committed to capture carbon on the land by reinvigorating the Carbon Farming Initiative to encourage carbon storage on the land and in agriculture, and taking decisive action to deal with broad scale land clearing. Will work with stakeholders to develop an appropriate “trigger” in federal environmental protection laws to cover Australia’s national and international commitments around climate change. » Require the adoption of consistent reporting of land and tree clearing across States and the Commonwealth » Reinvigorate the COAG National Vegetation Management Framework » Reinvigorate the Carbon Farming Initiative. Source 1
Test 18. Maintain funding for the National Climate Change Adaptation Research Facility?
Score
0.5 / 1
Comment
No formal commitment found - National Platform notes Australia’s publicly-funded science and research agencies should be properly resourced to support their critical contribution to society, productivity and economic growth. Australia’s regional and rural science capabilities, including within publicly-funded research agencies such as CSIRO, are essential.
Test 19. Introduce a national strategy and standards for sustainable and resilient cities and urban centres?
Score
2 / 3
Comment
National platform calls for development of integrated long term strategies.
In 2014 announced 10-point plan for better cities that includes 1.Investing in properly integrated transport systems involving public transport and roads 2.Investing in active transport solutions which connect up with public transport, education and employment hubs; 3. Addressing housing affordability through the use of urban planning, land supply and use of incentives; 4.Aligning greater housing density with public transport corridors; 5.Promoting jobs growth in outer suburbs; 6.Promoting jobs growth in middle rings around cities by investing in research precincts around universities and hospitals; 7.Supporting connectivity and productivity through fibre-to-the-premise National Broadband Network; 8.Supporting renewable energy including buildings and precincts that produce their own power in new developments; 9.Enhancing sustainability and resilience of household and industrial water supply and rehabilitating our urban waterways; 10.Cooperation between Governments to promote the development of second or third CBD’s to decentralize jobs growth.
National cycling strategy: Will invest $1.25 million in the Australian Bicycle Council to ensure the ongoing development of a national cycling strategy. Will require that all projects submitted to Infrastructure Australia add another criterion to its assessments – the inclusion of active transport modes including cycling and walking. We will also continue to work with States and Territories to consider establishing a new Walking, Riding and Access to Public Transport Council, as outlined in the 2013 Walking, Riding and Access to Public Transport report. Source 1, Source 2, Source 3
Test 20. Provide funding support for state and local government implementation of adaptation strategies?
Score
0 / 1
Comment
No funding commitment.
Test 21. Provide an effective national system of nature protection laws to protect and improve the health of Australia’s air, land, water and biodiversity by December 2018?
Score
2 / 5
Comment
Commitment in the National Platform to improve environmental law.
"Labor will deliver a robust and integrated system of environmental management. Labor will develop improved environmental law to build on Australia’s best-practice environmental governance. It will reflect Australians’ expectations that environmental protection is essential and ensure an effective and efficient national approach to the management of matters of national environmental significance." Source
Test 22. Expand Australian government oversight of climate issues, water resources, native vegetation and reserves within 12 months of taking office?
Score
2.5 / 3
Comment
ALP has committed to establish a Climate and Landclearing Trigger and to expand the Water Trigger to tight and shale gas. Commited to consider the appropriateness of a National Parks trigger. Source 1, Source 2, Source 3
Test 23. Ensure the federal government has direct responsibility to regulate projects that impact on matters of national importance?
Score
3 / 3
Comment
Commited to retaining Australian Government oversight.
"The Australian government has an enduring responsibility to protect matters of national environmental significance. Labor has a proud history of national environmental protection laws. These have been instrumental in protecting Australia’s greatest natural treasures for decades. Labor will not support handing approval powers under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Act 1999 to state and territory governments." Source
Test 24. Establish and adequately resource an independent statutory authority to administer our national environmental law by December 2018?
Score
1 / 3
Comment
Commited to develop new frameworks, including independence of institutions. Labor will develop new frameworks for truly national protection and management of Australia’s natural resources. This will include: Management, governance and decision making structures and responsibility, including the independence of institutions involved in environmental protection." Source
Test 25. Ensure greater public access and accountability under national environmental law, including open standing provisions and merits review of decisions within 12 months of taking office?
Score
0.5 / 1
Comment
Opposed to the repeal of Section 487 of the EPBC Act.
Test 26. Commit $1 billion annually by 2018 in a National Environment Fund?
Score
1 / 5
Comment
Labor will protect Australia’s biological diversity through a national system of comprehensive adequate and representative parks and reserves, while using education, regulation and incentives to achieve ecologically sustainable use elsewhere in the landscape. Labor will work with state and territory governments and landholders to develop, resource and implement threat abatement and recovery plans for threatened species and ecological communities, while preventing clearing that will have a significant impact on threatened ecological communities and critical habitats for threatened species."" Labor will cooperate with the states, territories and landholders to achieve a net increase in Australia’s vegetation cover, to improve its management and to end broad-scale clearing. Funding of state, territory and landholder projects will be conditional upon appropriate clearing controls being in place" Shorten Labor Government will inject $7.5 million to contain and reduce the Yellow Crazy Ant population in the Wet Tropics of Queensland." Source 1, Source 2
Test 27. Rule out logging, mining and other unsustainable land and sea uses in Australia’s World Heritage Areas?
Score
1 / 1
Comment
Does not support resource extraction in World Heritage Areas. "Labor does not support mining or other resource extraction in national parks and World Heritage areas." Source
Test 28. Introduce national policies and regulations to protect and restore ecosystems along the Great Dividing Range, including establishing the Great Forest National Park?
Score
1 / 3
Comment
Commitment to cooperative policies to deliver net increase in vegetation cover and management. "Labor will cooperate with the states, territories and landholders to achieve a net increase in Australia’s vegetation cover, to improve its management and to end broad-scale clearing. Funding of state, territory and landholder projects will be conditional upon appropriate clearing controls being in place" Source
Test 29. Create new tax incentives for the management and restoration of ecosystems on private land?
Score
0 / 1
Comment
No formal policy or commitment
Test 30. Increase funding for Indigenous Protected Areas, scaling up to $30 million per annum by 2020 as part of a National Environment Fund?
Score
0.5 / 1
Comment
National platform commitment to "Support employment programs for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people to work on and manage country, particularly through the highly successful Indigenous Ranger and Indigenous Protected Area programs" but no clear funding commitment yet. Source
Test 31. Commit to supporting the employment of 5,000 Indigenous rangers by 2025?
Score
1 / 1
Comment
National platform commitment to "Support employment programs for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people to work on and manage country, particularly through the highly successful Indigenous Ranger and Indigenous Protected Area programs" but no clear funding commitment yet. Source
Test 32. Provide commitments to the expansion of sustainable tourism and renewable energy initiatives across northern Australia to benefit local communities?
Score
1.5 / 3
Comment
General policy commitment but no explicit position on NAIF criteria. "Northern Australia has significant social service needs and economic infrastructure requirements. Labor will remove policy and other obstacles for future investment in infrastructure. Labor will encourage sustainable development in Northern Australia that protects the region’s natural environment, its water resources and its many social and cultural assets, while harnessing its potential, including greater use of renewable energy sources. Appropriate investment in water, energy, and transport and communications infrastructure is critical to the future development of Northern Australia." Source
Test 33. Deliver the commitments made under the Murray Darling Basin Plan on time and in full, including the delivery of outcomes equivalent to 3,200 gigalitres in environmental water?
Score
3 / 3
Comment
Commitment to the Murray Darling Basin Plan. "Labor supports the Murray-Darling Basin Plan, which will keep the mouth of the River Murray open nine years out of ten and enable the export of salt and sediment from the system. Within legal and physical constraints, the Plan will return enough water to the Basin to protect key environmental sites, including the Ramsar wetland sites." Source
Test 34. Provide a plan to reward private landholders for managing floodplains to produce environmental benefits for the river system?
Score
0 / 1
Comment
No formal policy or commitment
Test 35. Adequately resource the Commonwealth Environmental Water Holder to build and deliver its critically important portfolio of environment water?
Score
3 / 3
Comment
"The Murray-Darling Basin Plan is a historic agreement that represents a significant step forward in the management of our most important river system. Labor is committed to achieving the plan and ensuring a healthy future for the Murray-Darling, and as such we are fully committed to the role and operation of the Commonwealth Environment Water Holder for the full duration of the basin plan."
Test 36. Support and fund a science-driven program to eradicate invasive European carp in the Murray-Darling Basin?
Score
1 / 1
Comment
"European carp (Cyprinus carpio) is considered one of Australia's major aquatic pests since it spread through the Murray Darling Basin in the late 1980s. Previously held in check by the drought, recent years of flooding rains have resulted in significant expansion of the carp population. I acknowledge the increasing pressure this has placed on our waterways and native wildlife and as such fully support the research being undertaken by the CSIRO Australian Animal Health Laboratory. A Labor Government will continue with the plans to control Carp in the Murray-Darling". Source
Test 37. Revitalise national water reform in Australia and set out a road-map for the recognition of Indigenous water rights?
Score
0 / 1
Comment
No formal policy, notes that addressing Australia’s long-term water issues requires national leadership.
Test 38. Introduce a well-resourced and complete system of annual national and regional environmental accounts by 2019?
Score
0 / 1
Comment
No formal policy or commitment
Test 39. Expand the mandate of the Productivity Commission to explicitly include environmental issues?
Score
0 / 1
Comment
No formal policy or commitment
Test 40. Introduce transparent and independent analysis of the social, economic and environmental costs and benefits of all major projects by 2017?
Score
0 / 1
Comment
No formal policy or commitment
back to the scoreboardSupport clean energy
Go 100% clean energy
Be nuclear free
How did we calculate these scores?
We measured the policies of each party against 40 tests set out in ACF’s National Agenda 2016. The tests are grouped under three broad headings: clean energy, cutting pollution and protecting nature. Together, these are the policy commitments we believe are required to protect people rivers, reefs, forests and wildlife for future generations.
We have ranked the 40 tests into three categories: critical issues (worth 5 marks), priority issues (worth 3 marks) and important issues (worth 1 mark). For each policy offering, we decide how many of the total available marks to award on the basis of how completely the policy fulfils our test. In some cases, such as where a policy unwinds existing environmental protection, we award negative marks. The total score out of 100 is our assessment of the strength of the party’s overall policy offering as it relates to the issues in ACF’s National Agenda. In the case of the minor parties on our scorecard, we haven taken into account their lesser relative capacity and have looked for strong in-principle commitments to deliver the policies our tests require, rather than detailed policy design. We have not assessed policy which falls outside our agenda.
Cut pollution
Targets
Shift away from polluting coal
Help communities and nature thrive
How did we calculate these scores?
We measured the policies of each party against 40 tests set out in ACF’s National Agenda 2016. The tests are grouped under three broad headings: clean energy, cutting pollution and protecting nature. Together, these are the policy commitments we believe are required to protect people rivers, reefs, forests and wildlife for future generations.
We have ranked the 40 tests into three categories: critical issues (worth 5 marks), priority issues (worth 3 marks) and important issues (worth 1 mark). For each policy offering, we decide how many of the total available marks to award on the basis of how completely the policy fulfils our test. In some cases, such as where a policy unwinds existing environmental protection, we award negative marks. The total score out of 100 is our assessment of the strength of the party’s overall policy offering as it relates to the issues in ACF’s National Agenda. In the case of the minor parties on our scorecard, we haven taken into account their lesser relative capacity and have looked for strong in-principle commitments to deliver the policies our tests require, rather than detailed policy design. We have not assessed policy which falls outside our agenda.
Protect our reefs, rivers, forests & wildlife
Create strong laws to protect air, water and wildlife
Re-connect habitats
Help nature and culture thrive in the north
Keep the Murray flowing
Value nature in government decision making
How did we calculate these scores?
We measured the policies of each party against 40 tests set out in ACF’s National Agenda 2016. The tests are grouped under three broad headings: clean energy, cutting pollution and protecting nature. Together, these are the policy commitments we believe are required to protect people rivers, reefs, forests and wildlife for future generations.
We have ranked the 40 tests into three categories: critical issues (worth 5 marks), priority issues (worth 3 marks) and important issues (worth 1 mark). For each policy offering, we decide how many of the total available marks to award on the basis of how completely the policy fulfils our test. In some cases, such as where a policy unwinds existing environmental protection, we award negative marks. The total score out of 100 is our assessment of the strength of the party’s overall policy offering as it relates to the issues in ACF’s National Agenda. In the case of the minor parties on our scorecard, we haven taken into account their lesser relative capacity and have looked for strong in-principle commitments to deliver the policies our tests require, rather than detailed policy design. We have not assessed policy which falls outside our agenda.